Visual inspection library · Fire safety
Show door identity, leaf and frame, accessible seals and hardware, then document what needs a proper operational check.
Hold to record. Keep holding while you film and speak; release to save the clip and its transcribed answer.
Four 9:16 example clips generated in Google Flow. Fictional inspection; no customer site is shown.
App-style example using Google Flow footage. The animated recording interface and gradually appearing words are scripted; no real inspection or live transcription took place.
The full visual example
Each short clip shows one point in the guided route. The footage is AI-generated and the observations are scripted examples, not findings from a real inspection.
Show the door in its corridor context and record its unique ID outside any personal footage.
A staged communal-style door is visible; its real specification is unknown.
From a safe position, show accessible edges and obvious damage without claiming gap measurements.
The staged leaf and frame are shown; gaps are not measured.
Show accessible seals, hinges and glazing details without removing or disturbing components.
An exposed door edge and hinge are illustrated; how the synthetic view was obtained and component performance are not established.
Show the closer and finish with a context view. A separate procedure must verify operation.
A closer location is illustrated, but the closing action was not tested.
Identify the building and door. Film the leaf, frame, accessible seals and hardware without alteration. Refer concerns to the Responsible Person and complete any required closer test separately. Video shows visible condition only. It cannot prove fire resistance, certification, measured gaps, seal suitability or closer operation. The Responsible Person must complete applicable checks and records separately.
Last updated . Facts checked on 9 October 2026 against GOV.UK · Fire door guidance for Responsible Persons and GOV.UK · Fire doors checklist (accessible).
A completed visual example
The six-page sample contains four inspection points, twelve footage stills, scripted observations and follow-up actions. The preview shows the first visual-evidence page.
Fictional sample. Footage was generated in Flow and observations are scripted; pages 3–4 contain still frames from all four clips.
Visual evidence · page 3 of 6 ↗The guided route
Identify the building and door. Film the leaf, frame, accessible seals and hardware without alteration. Refer concerns to the Responsible Person and complete any required closer test separately.
Show the door in its corridor context and record its unique ID outside any personal footage.
“A staged communal-style door is visible; its real specification is unknown.”Scripted example, not a real finding.
From a safe position, show accessible edges and obvious damage without claiming gap measurements.
“The staged leaf and frame are shown; gaps are not measured.”Scripted example, not a real finding.
Show accessible seals, hinges and glazing details without removing or disturbing components.
“An exposed door edge and hinge are illustrated; how the synthetic view was obtained and component performance are not established.”Scripted example, not a real finding.
Show the closer and finish with a context view. A separate procedure must verify operation.
“A closer location is illustrated, but the closing action was not tested.”Scripted example, not a real finding.
How to use the record
Record the asset or site, visit stage, date and inspector. Keep each clip attached to its point and note anything inaccessible.
Say what the camera shows and where it is. Record the next action without guessing the cause or declaring a specialist result from video.
Explains Responsible Person checks for doors and closers under the England regulations. GOV.UK · Fire door guidance for Responsible Persons ↗
Video shows visible condition only. It cannot prove fire resistance, certification, measured gaps, seal suitability or closer operation. The Responsible Person must complete applicable checks and records separately.
Questions, answered
No. The Responsible Person must complete and record the checks that apply to the building, including function where required.
No. Certification, specification, installation and fire-risk information must be established from appropriate records and competent assessment.
No. Film accessible condition only; do not alter safety components.
The Responsible Person should apply the fire-safety process and obtain competent advice where needed.
Guidance checked 9 October 2026. The four-point route is a SiteSurvey example, not a method prescribed by these sources.
Explains Responsible Person checks for doors and closers under the England regulations.
Lists door, frame, seal and closer items; video alone cannot complete the check.
Search research: Keywords Everywhere estimated 880 UK monthly searches for “fire door checks” when checked 9 October 2026. Search intent is likely to favour formal compliance checks. This page covers visual evidence only and does not replace a competent fire-door inspection. This is not a traffic or conversion forecast.
SiteSurvey Walk Cam explains the product capability. The clips are AI-generated examples.